Skin divers or micro dermals?

I am considering getting my collar bone pierced (around there, not on top… But the area underneath the bone)

First i've heard of just a surface piercing (clavicle piercing) and i've heard they reject very easily. Then i heard of 'micral dermals' and they have a lower rejection rate.

There is also a new thing called a 'skin diver', they're not as permanent and my piercer told me about them.

I've researched a lot about both… But i'm still stuck on which one to get; A micro dermal or a skin diver. Which one is better (Easier to take care of, last longer, more painless)
I've heard so many pros and cons about both and am totally stuck.

Please help!

Please, no rude/pointless answers. Answers from people who are either piercers, who have one of that said piercing or have researched or any other experience.

Thanks in advance!