i was wondering, do u think women/Girl care about the for skin, is it more or less pleasure for me/them, i want to know if i should/can still get a circumcision
Best Answer – Chosen by Voters Any woman that doesn't like a foreskin is so shallow and empty headed that she isn't worth going with.The foreskin protects the glans, and keeps it sensitive. It also makes it easier, and more pleasurable, for the to enter the vagina, and move once in there. It also acts as a dam to keep the lubricating fluids in place to increase the pleasure for both of you.There are no benefits whatsoever to circumcision, it's not cleaner, the foreskin can easily be retracted in the bath or shower, and it does not help prevent infection.The USA have the highest rate of infant circumcision in the world, and also have the highest rates of STDs and HIV, so it obviously doesn't work over there.Penile cancer is so rare that any reports saying that circumcision helps to prevent it are meaningless.If you do get circumcised, and there are no complications, the skin on your glans will harden over time, and you may well reach the point where it's so insensitive that you can no longer have sex without taking drugs such as viagra.Depending on your point of view, the foreskin was put there either by god or several million years of evolution, and who are we to say that either of those have made a mistake? Source(s): 85% of men on the planet have a foreskin, and they can't all be wrong.
That probably isn't the best reason to circumcise (although I have nothing against the practice). Even though in places where most men are circumcised women will prefer circumcised it won't make too much difference for them.Presence or absence of foreskin has no bearing on sexual function unless the foreskin is actually causing a problem. This has even been confirmed by physiological measurement and a 2008 study of 4, 500 men before and after circumcision in the UK based urology journal BJU International confirmed it. There is a rumour propagated by gay men who practice docking (ie. head of in each other's foreskin) that circumcision reduces pleasure for men. However that is just to scare women out of circumcising their son. They will stoop to anything to achieve that as few men turn their mind to the issue later on and if they can con parents they get their way. After all there are no public education campaigns encouraging men to circumcise are there?However if you get done you can’t have sex for 6 weeks and will need to get stitches and experience the risk of general anaesthetic. It is safer and easier as a baby and you have missed many of the medical benefits.As regards women's pleasure the research indicate that women tend to report more sexual satisfaction with circumcised men and tend to orgasm faster during intercourse with circumcised men. However the difference isn't great.I notice that anti-circs keep saying that 85% of men aren't circed. I have long wondered about that. A research paper published this month advised that 1/3 of the world's men are circumcised. That would mean about 66% are uncircumcised. Since 2 out of 3 of the major world (Islam and Judaism) require circumcision and America (a Christian based country) has majority circ and places like Australia and New Zealand have most of the male population coming from a time when they were virtually all circed and Australia's circumcision declined gradually, continued to be significant and has been increasing recently, and circumcision is a coming of age ritual for Pacific Islanders, Australian Aborigines, and some African tribes 85% does sound a little high for uncirced. I wonder?There is a lot of fiction about circumcision on the net and anti-circ activists often even swoop on places like this to propagate it. The American Academy of Pediatrics advises people not to rely upon information from unsubstantiated internet sites. I have provided the site of a medical research scientist who has completed a lot of related work. You can verify his credentials on the University of Sydney internet site. Source(s): http://www.circinfo0o0net
Its physically cleaner to get a circumcision and your more likely not to get infections down there, woman wise the pleasure is all the same with or without the forskin so there's nothing to worry about there. But in the end its up to you as most people get it done during the first 8 days or so. Some people experience more pleasure due to the sensitivity increasing and others a tiny bit less. good luck
NO…don't get a circumcision. Esp for a woman. Most women appreciate an intact man (I do) The pros of having a foreskin, for you and your partner, far out weigh any negatives (there are none). An intact is much more attractive, and pleasurable, Source(s): RN/sex health/family planning
There are medical benefits associated that you might be interested in. Most women prefer men to be circumcised because it looks better and it is more pleasurable for women. However if you partner with someone and they love you they wouldn't hold your lack of circumcision against you.
I would prefer my man to have foreskin. It looks sexier, is funner to play with, and the sex is more pleasurable for both of us. I like knowing he has ALL his , that his parents didn't force a needless surgery on him at birth. Keep your working parts. Most women prefer uncircumcised.
Guys with foreskin have more sensitivity – more pleasurable sex. Leave it unless it's causing medical issues. As long as you're conscious of keeping it clean under there it's no more or less cleanly than being circumcised. I'd kill to still have mine. Trade ya willies? lol
Women should care about the foreskin. It's there in part to keep their vaginas healthy. Of course you shouldn't get circumcised! Do you even have a clue how much damage circumcision does to the ?
there is research that finds that women feel more pleasure form an intact circumcision is unnecessary most males are intact about 80% world wide Source(s): http://nocircumcision.blogspot0o0com
11 Responses for "Question about the penis skin?"
Best Answer – Chosen by Voters Any woman that doesn't like a foreskin is so shallow and empty headed that she isn't worth going with.The foreskin protects the glans, and keeps it sensitive. It also makes it easier, and more pleasurable, for the to enter the vagina, and move once in there. It also acts as a dam to keep the lubricating fluids in place to increase the pleasure for both of you.There are no benefits whatsoever to circumcision, it's not cleaner, the foreskin can easily be retracted in the bath or shower, and it does not help prevent infection.The USA have the highest rate of infant circumcision in the world, and also have the highest rates of STDs and HIV, so it obviously doesn't work over there.Penile cancer is so rare that any reports saying that circumcision helps to prevent it are meaningless.If you do get circumcised, and there are no complications, the skin on your glans will harden over time, and you may well reach the point where it's so insensitive that you can no longer have sex without taking drugs such as viagra.Depending on your point of view, the foreskin was put there either by god or several million years of evolution, and who are we to say that either of those have made a mistake? Source(s): 85% of men on the planet have a foreskin, and they can't all be wrong.
That probably isn't the best reason to circumcise (although I have nothing against the practice). Even though in places where most men are circumcised women will prefer circumcised it won't make too much difference for them.Presence or absence of foreskin has no bearing on sexual function unless the foreskin is actually causing a problem. This has even been confirmed by physiological measurement and a 2008 study of 4, 500 men before and after circumcision in the UK based urology journal BJU International confirmed it. There is a rumour propagated by gay men who practice docking (ie. head of in each other's foreskin) that circumcision reduces pleasure for men. However that is just to scare women out of circumcising their son. They will stoop to anything to achieve that as few men turn their mind to the issue later on and if they can con parents they get their way. After all there are no public education campaigns encouraging men to circumcise are there?However if you get done you can’t have sex for 6 weeks and will need to get stitches and experience the risk of general anaesthetic. It is safer and easier as a baby and you have missed many of the medical benefits.As regards women's pleasure the research indicate that women tend to report more sexual satisfaction with circumcised men and tend to orgasm faster during intercourse with circumcised men. However the difference isn't great.I notice that anti-circs keep saying that 85% of men aren't circed. I have long wondered about that. A research paper published this month advised that 1/3 of the world's men are circumcised. That would mean about 66% are uncircumcised. Since 2 out of 3 of the major world (Islam and Judaism) require circumcision and America (a Christian based country) has majority circ and places like Australia and New Zealand have most of the male population coming from a time when they were virtually all circed and Australia's circumcision declined gradually, continued to be significant and has been increasing recently, and circumcision is a coming of age ritual for Pacific Islanders, Australian Aborigines, and some African tribes 85% does sound a little high for uncirced. I wonder?There is a lot of fiction about circumcision on the net and anti-circ activists often even swoop on places like this to propagate it. The American Academy of Pediatrics advises people not to rely upon information from unsubstantiated internet sites. I have provided the site of a medical research scientist who has completed a lot of related work. You can verify his credentials on the University of Sydney internet site. Source(s): http://www.circinfo0o0net
Its physically cleaner to get a circumcision and your more likely not to get infections down there, woman wise the pleasure is all the same with or without the forskin so there's nothing to worry about there. But in the end its up to you as most people get it done during the first 8 days or so. Some people experience more pleasure due to the sensitivity increasing and others a tiny bit less.
good luck
NO…don't get a circumcision. Esp for a woman. Most women appreciate an intact man (I do) The pros of having a foreskin, for you and your partner, far out weigh any negatives (there are none). An intact is much more attractive, and pleasurable,
Source(s): RN/sex health/family planning
There are medical benefits associated that you might be interested in. Most women prefer men to be circumcised because it looks better and it is more pleasurable for women. However if you partner with someone and they love you they wouldn't hold your lack of circumcision against you.
I would prefer my man to have foreskin. It looks sexier, is funner to play with, and the sex is more pleasurable for both of us. I like knowing he has ALL his , that his parents didn't force a needless surgery on him at birth. Keep your working parts. Most women prefer uncircumcised.
Guys with foreskin have more sensitivity – more pleasurable sex. Leave it unless it's causing medical issues. As long as you're conscious of keeping it clean under there it's no more or less cleanly than being circumcised. I'd kill to still have mine. Trade ya willies? lol
Women should care about the foreskin. It's there in part to keep their vaginas healthy. Of course you shouldn't get circumcised! Do you even have a clue how much damage circumcision does to the ?
there is research that finds that women feel more pleasure form an intact circumcision is unnecessary most males are intact about 80% world wide Source(s): http://nocircumcision.blogspot0o0com
unless its causing you pain or a medical problem just leave it.Chris
are you gay?
Leave a reply